NET 0 Tracker
Reduction and Net Zero Targets
>Note: intensity targets are not represented in the current version - see Methodology
Gross Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Absolute Emission Reductions
There is no absolute emission reduction recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Net Zero Future Commitments
There is no net zero target recorded in our database. Email us to report missing information Email
Science-based Targets (SBTI)
Date Published / Updated :2022-02-24 01:00:00
| Near-term | Long-Term | Net Zero Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Targets set : 1.5°C/Well-below 2°C by 2030 | No target | Commitment removed |
BMW Group commits to reduce scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions 80% per vehicle produced by 2030 from a 2019 base year. * BMW Group commits to reduce scope 3 GHG emissions from use of sold products 50% per vehicle kilometer by 2030 from a 2019 base year. BMW Group commits to reduce scope 3 GHG emissions from purchased goods & services and upstream transportation & distribution services 22% per vehicle sold by 2030 from a 2019 base year. *The target boundary includes biogenic emissions and removals from bioenergy feedstocks. Auto manufacturers have two near-term target temperature alignments for 1) scope 1 and 2 emissions and 2) scope 3 category 11 emissions from use of sold products.
Data source: SBTIOffsets
Last update for BMW AG by zerotracker.net: July 24, 2026| Planning to use external offset credits | Yes |
| Separate targets for emission reductions and removals | No |
| Conditions on use of offset credits |
|
| Plans for carbon dioxide removal (CDR) | Not Specified |
Additional notes: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-62970-w The negligible role of carbon offsetting in corporate climate strategies ....the BMW Group, which spent more on voluntary offsetting - 2.3 times their compliance emission trading costs - since they could cover their emissions with excess allowances from past years Among oil and gas companies, Eni (1.4%) and BP (0.7%) offset the largest shares of their emissions, while in the automobile manufacturing sector, Volkswagen Group (1.1%) and BMW (0.7%) offset the most. The picture changes substantially when focusing solely on scope 1 and location-based scope 2 emissions. The three automobile manufacturers that offset their emissions, Volkswagen Group (50.3%), BMW (45.2%), and Mercedes-Benz Group (40.3%), emerge among the largest five offsetters of scope 1 and 2 emissions (see Fig. 5b). These offset shares rise further when considering market-based scope 2 emissions since BMW and Mercedes-Benz Group offset their full scope 1 and market-based scope 2 emissions. However, even limited to scope 1 and 2 emissions, oil and gas companies offset minor emission shares. Shell (9.8%) has the largest share of offset scope 1 and 2 emissions in the oil and gas sector, followed by Eni (7.5%) and BP (7%).
Score Summary
| Ref | Principle |
Score
(points) |
Max
(points) |
Delta
(points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | At least 2 years of GHG emissions for scope 1 and 2 are publicly-available and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Scope 3 emissions are fully reported and externally-verified | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | CDP score demonstrates the level of transparent disclosures | 9.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Transparency | 9.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | |
| 4 | Net Zero Commitments by 2050 include an intermediate target and cover all the emissions | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Net Zero targets demonstrate a high-level of emergency | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Emission reduction targets on a forward-looking basis are ambitious | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Targets are science-based as validated by SBTi | 7.5 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| Commitments | 7.5 | 40.0 | 0.0 | |
| 8 | Results re. operational emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Results re. value chain emissions reduction: on-pace (performance-to-date) and momentum (forward-looking targets) | 0.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Implied Temperature Rating by MSCi | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Results | 10.0 | 30.0 | 10.0 | |
| Total | 26.5 | 100.0 | 10.0 |
Score Details
| Criteria | Results | 2024 Score | 2023 Score | Vs. 2023 | 2022 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria 1 : Transparency on operational emissions (Scope 1 + 2) | |||||
| Are S1+S2 figures publicly-disclosed for the last reporting year and the preceding period? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Are S1+S2 figures verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0/ 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 2 : Transparency on value chain emissions (Scope 3) | |||||
| Are the 15 categories fully or partly disclosed? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Are S3 figures fully or partly verified by a 3rd-party for the last reporting year? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 3 : Quality and Frequency of reporting | |||||
| What is the latest CDP score (no later than the preceding year)? | A- | 9.0 / 10.0 | 9.0 | 0.0 | |
| How many interim reporting were provided between 2 reporting periods (GHG emissions only)? | |||||
| Criteria 4 : Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Does the net 0 target include a statement of a generally-accepted net zero emission target by 2050? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Does the net zero target include an intermediate target by 2030? | NC | 0.0 / 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Does the net zero target include all the emissions? | NC | 0.0 / 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 5 : Target year for Net Zero Commitments | |||||
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Target year for achieving net zero emissions for S1+S2+S3 combined? | NC | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 6 : Reduction objectives | |||||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2? | 0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
| What is the forward-looking GHG% reduction (without compensation) for scope 1+2+3? |
No target found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 7 : Science-Based Targets | |||||
| What type of science-based target (as validated by SBTi) did the company commit to? | Targets Set Well-below 2°C | 7.5 / 10.0 | 7.5 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 8 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 9 : Results based on scope 1 - 2 - 3 | |||||
| Performance to date: cumulative% reduction vs. target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Momentum: last year % reduction vs. forward-looking target |
Objective (in %):
Actual (in %): The last reporting year could not be found
|
0.0 / 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Criteria 10 : Implied Temperature Rise (ITR) | |||||
| Is the company aligned with global climate targets? | ITR: 1.4°C | 10.0 / 10.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 | |
| Total | 26.5 / 100.0 | 16.5 | 10.0 | ||